Shift-left testing is an approach focused on introducing testing much earlier into the software development life cycle. The shift in shift-left testing refers to a change not only in workflow but also in the approach to testing in general. It aims to make testing more interwoven into the development process, rather than leaving it as the last step before the finished product.
While it’s easy enough to understand shift-left testing as a theoretical concept, it is much more crucial to realise its meaning in practice: Shift-left isn’t just about testing earlier – it’s about working together earlier.
Efficient and comfortable collaboration between your developers and your testers or lack thereof can make or break your whole development life cycle. In this article, you will learn why it’s so important and how to make it work in your team.
Shift-Left = Shared Responsibility
Traditionally, devs build and testers verify. But shift-left flips that dynamic: quality becomes a team effort. That only works if testers and developers collaborate continuously, building a shared sense of ownership over quality across the entire team.
Effective shift-left means many things, among them:
- Testers shape acceptance criteria before coding starts.
- Developers think about testability during design.
- Both roles co-own test automation, coverage, and feedback loops.
Without this synergy, early testing becomes a box-checking exercise – missing its real value.
From Concept to Practice: Building Real Developer-Tester Collaboration
Strong collaboration between developers and testers doesn’t happen by chance – it’s intentionally designed and reinforced through specific workflows, shared tools, and team habits.
We’ve gathered a list of practices you might want to consider introducing in your team. Their collaborative nature supports the successful shift-left and helps transform testing from an isolated task into an organic part of the development process.
Co-Create Test Cases Early
What it looks like:
Before development begins, developers and testers work together to define how a feature will be tested. They discuss edge cases, success criteria, and potential risks, resulting in shared understanding.
How to enable it:
- Use Example Mapping or Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) tools to write clear, testable scenarios.
- Involve product owners to clarify requirements and business logic.
- Treat test cases as a collaborative artifact, not a handoff.
Pair During Story Implementation
What it looks like:
Testers and developers work side-by-side (physically or virtually) as features are implemented, with testers giving real-time feedback on testability and edge cases.
How to enable it:
- Schedule test–dev pairing sessions – especially for complex or high-risk stories.
- Encourage testers to ask questions during implementation: “What will be hard to test here?”
- Use collaborative tools for remote pairing.
Share Responsibility for Testing
What it looks like:
Testing isn’t “the tester’s job.” Developers write unit and integration tests; testers focus on exploratory and end-to-end – but both contribute to and maintain the test suite.
How to enable it:
- Maintain a shared code repository for tests.
- Use a unified CI/CD pipeline that runs all types of tests and provides shared visibility.
- Include test automation in your Definition of Done.
Joint Review of Acceptance Criteria & Coverage
What it looks like:
Acceptance criteria are clear, testable, and agreed on by developers, testers, and product owners. As development progresses, coverage is regularly reviewed to ensure alignment.
How to enable it:
- Hold “Three Amigos” sessions (Dev, QA, PO) before starting on each story.
- Revisit criteria mid-sprint if requirements evolve.
- Include acceptance criteria reviews in sprint planning and backlog refinements.
- During retrospectives, address ways the team can more effectively manage acceptance criteria collaboratively.
Include Testers in Code Reviews
What it looks like:
Even if testers aren’t writing production code, they review pull requests with a focus on testability, coverage, and edge cases.
How to enable it:
- Give testers access to the codebase and version control system.
- Encourage questions like “Is this feature testable?” or “Are automated hooks in place?”
- Treat code reviews as quality reviews – not just syntax checks.
Keep the Conversation Going in Real Time
What it looks like:
Developers and testers communicate frequently during feature development – not just when bugs are found. They solve problems together, not in silos.
How to enable it:
Use testing software as a communication tool. Testing software doesn’t have to be just a results dashboard – it can be a space for conversation. Many modern testing platforms allow commenting, tagging, and linking to related issues. This lets developers and testers collaborate directly in the context of a specific test case or failure. The goal is to reduce the lag between feedback and action by creating a space in which developers and testers can comfortably work together.
Common Challenges & How to Overcome Them
Even when teams understand the value of collaboration, putting it into practice can be tricky. Here are some of the most common roadblocks – and how to work through them.
“Testers Don’t Code”
Not every tester has a development background, and that’s okay. Collaboration doesn’t require full-stack skills – it requires accessibility. To bridge this gap:
- Use low-code or no-code test automation tools, which allow testers to build robust tests without writing code.
- Encourage pairing sessions where testers and developers sit together to co-create test cases or scripts. It’s a great way to transfer knowledge and build mutual respect.
“Developers Don’t Value Testing”
If testing is seen as a bottleneck – or worse, a nuisance – quality will suffer. Combat this by:
- Defining shared quality KPIs: for example, defect escape rate, test coverage, or build stability. When everyone is measured against the same outcomes, quality becomes a team priority.
- Celebrate quality wins: a sprint with no regressions or a successful release with zero critical bugs deserves recognition. Make quality visible and valued.
Time Pressure
The rush to deliver fast often pushes collaboration to the back burner. But skipping it leads to more bugs, rework, and delays later. Remind the team:
- Early collaboration saves time. A 30-minute discussion before coding can prevent days of debugging afterward.
- When testers are looped in early, they can start designing tests in parallel with development – not wait until the feature is “done.”
- Don’t let weak spots grow unnoticed. Identifying issues early is much easier when testing and development are tightly integrated.
Measurable Benefits of Strong Collaboration
When developers and testers work as a team from the start, the results speak for themselves:
- Faster feedback loops mean defects are caught in hours, not days.
- Fewer bugs in later stages reduces last-minute stress and hotfixes.
- Improved test coverage across unit, integration, and end-to-end layers.
- Higher team morale as finger-pointing disappears and ownership grows.
Conclusion
Shift-left testing isn’t just about testing earlier – it’s about thinking differently. It’s a cultural and process shift that places quality at the heart of everything a team does.
And at the center of that shift is collaboration. Not a handoff between roles, but a partnership where testers and developers build together, test together, and learn together.
Start by having your testers and developers sit together in your next planning session. That simple step could shift your whole process – and your outcomes – to the next level.
Need additional support? Try QAlity Plus for better dev-tester collaboration in Jira ->













